History Ireland Apologises

There has been some great news over at Liam Hogan’s Limerick1914 Twitter feed. As you may remember, Liam was unjustly attacked by the ‘National Historian’ of the Ancient Order of Hibernians, Mike McCormack, in a letter in the pages of the magazine, History Ireland.

Now, the editor of History Ireland has apologised. I suspect that they realised how damaging this matter was to their reputation. While the apology is gracious and I am delighted for Liam Hogan’s sake, I am not sure if I will ever buy a copy of the magazine again. Robust debate is fine and personal attacks should be avoided in publications of that type (that’s what blogs like this are for!), but there is another issue which is in many ways far more important. Should Mike McCormack be allowed to publish a letter in a history magazine which contains claims about the existence of documents of parentage recording the breeding of Irish girls with Mandingo warriors, documents which obviously don’t exist? In other words, I wouldn’t publish a letter making fake claims like this, except to mock it and rip it to shreds, and I don’t think History Ireland should either. Anyway, here is the apology. Comhghairdeas leat, a Liam. Coinnigh ort leis an dea-obair!

Apology to Liam Hogan

In the September/October 2017 edition of History Ireland I published a letter from Mr Mike McCormack of the Ancient Order of Hibernians in America headed ‘The Irish and slavery’. Mr McCormack’s letter took issue with an earlier article by John Donoghue but also made personal reference to Mr Liam Hogan, who co-authored an article published in the March/April 2016 edition of History Ireland entitled ‘The Irish in the Anglo-Carribean: servants or slaves?’.

I acknowledge and accept that Mr McCormack’s letter unfairly targeted Mr Hogan, denigrated his professional reputation and disparaged his motivations in carrying out his important research into the topical issue of the Irish slaves myth. Specifcally, I accept that Mr Hogan was accused of engaging in “Irish American bashing” and being a “bigot”.

I acknowledge that Mr Hogan is a respected librarian and historian who has carried out extensive and diligent research and work on this topic which has been fair, ethical and subject to the appropriate rigours of scholarly historical research. I acknowledge and agree that at no stage has Mr Hogan been in any way intolerant of others or bigoted and that the allegation to the contrary should not have been published.  History Ireland is committed to being a forum for robust academic discussion but does not condone personalised attacks such as was contained in this letter. We regret that we failed to live up to this principle on this occasion.

I apologise unreservedly to Mr Hogan on behalf of History Ireland. I acknowledge and regret the damage to his reputation that the publication of Mr McCormack’s letter has caused. Mr Hogan’s own response to the letter will appear in the November/December 2017 edition of History Ireland.

Tommy Graham

Editor

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “History Ireland Apologises

  1. Adrian Martyn

    Not good enough. The postscript to the above reads: “At the time of the extended deadline and at the time of going to press no response was received from Mr. Hogan. T.G.” That’s not the case; no response was PUBLISHED. Why not?

    Reply
  2. DebunkerOfCassidy Post author

    Seriously, Adrian? So there’s no reply by Liam in the November/December edition? I was looking for a copy of it in Eason’s today (not to buy, just to stand and read!) but it hadn’t come in yet. As you say – why haven’t they published the rebuttal? They were ready enough to publish the shite from Mike McCormack!

    Reply
    1. Adrian Martyn

      No reply from Liam Hogan was published, nor was the matter alluded to on the front page or in the editorial. My own letter was refused publication as they said it left them open to libel, but frankly I didn’t mind if Liam’s was printed instead. It was not. The bare legal minimum has been done, without the slightest sign of genuine contrition, or acknowledgement of the damage it has done to scholarship. Nor is there any allusion to any other historians sending letters on the matter. Given the coverage of the matter by the likes of yourself, Ted McCormick (https://memoriousblog.wordpress.com/2017/09/29/history-in-the-toilet/), and Vox Hiberionacum (https://voxhiberionacum.wordpress.com/2017/09/02/history-ireland-magazine-and-the-ancient-order-of-shitebernians/#comments), I find it hard to believe no other historians wrote to them. Think back to the number who signed the “Open Letter to Irish Central …” –
      surely some of them put their names to something on the matter? Meanwhile, HI did publish Ted McCormick’s dissection of John Donoghue’s troubling article (so far so good), but then gave Donoghue as much room to reply to that. Frankly, I am disgusted at Tommy Graham’s actions. I’ve loved HI since it started, yet I cannot see how I can continue reading it or recommending it any longer. And where is the solidarity from fellow historians?

      Reply
      1. DebunkerOfCassidy Post author

        Sorry about the delay there. I was off line for a while. I agree with you entirely. It’s time professional historians put themselves on record to attack this nonsense. While I think HI did publish some good stuff, the popular aspects have always outweighed the scholarly. See my posts here about an awful article on Irish vampirism by Bob Curran.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s